| Country | Number of requests | Percentage of requests where some or all information was produced | Number of accounts specified |
|---|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 2 | 0% | 1 |
| Brazil | 7 | 0% | 7 |
| Finland | 1 | 100% | 3 |
| Hungary | 1 | 0% | 1 |
| India | 7 | 0% | 20 |
| Malaysia | 1 | 0% | 1 |
| Mexico | 1 | 0% | 1 |
| Monaco | 1 | 0% | 1 |
| Peru | 1 | 0% | 1 |
| Singapore | 1 | 0% | 1 |
| Spain | 3 | 0% | 11 |
| Switzerland | 1 | 0% | 1 |
| Taiwan | 1 | 0% | 2 |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 0% | 2 |
| United States | 39 | 92% | 109 |
| Total | 68 | 54% | 162 |
| Subpoenas | Court orders | Search warrants | Wiretap orders | Pen register orders | Emergency requests | Notice to furnish |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 69% | 10% | 13% | 0% | 3% | 0% | 5% |
| Country | Total | Fraud | Calls to violence | Technologically harmful | Sites specified | Disclosed due to request |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 100% |
| Hungary | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0% |
| Spain | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 0% |
| Total | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 6% |
Notes
- With regards to Disclosure Requests Received from EU Member States, this data provided is according to the requirements of the DSA, Article 15, “Transparency reporting obligations for providers of intermediary services.”
- The information provided is for the total number of disclosure requests per country, broken down by type of reported content at issue.
- Explanation of Median Time Reporting:
- We report the median time in hours for two key stages: The initial response to the request, and the “Substantive Response.”
- The latter is significantly longer because we follow a thorough process to ensure all legal requirements are met before disclosing user information, which often involves back-and-forth communication with the reporting government.
- Consequently, these requests are only marked as complete once the entire process is finalized, which can substantially extend the median response time.
Recent Examples
Here are recent examples of requests for user information that we received from government sources. We did not provide information in response to these requests.
Monaco
- A law enforcement agency in Monaco submitted an information request targeting a WordPress.com site, in which they accused the site of ‘Public Injury and Defamation’ charges against high ranking government figures. No valid legal process was provided.
India
- An Indian law enforcement agency requested detailed information on several sites concerning a familial dispute surrounding the trademark of a popular Indian food brand. The complainant alleged that the sites contained multiple instances of defamation. No valid legal process was provided.
Transparency Report 