2024: Jan 1 – Jun 30

CountryNumber of requestsPercentage of requests where some or all information was producedNumber of accounts specified
Austria10%1
Brazil30%2
Germany70%6
India70%9
Ireland10%1
Malta10%1
Singapore10%1
Spain30%7
Switzerland250%4
Turkey10%1
United States2986%55
Total5646%88
*Includes valid emergency requests if any were received during this period.
**Includes information provided when a valid MLAT request has been made.
SubpoenasCourt ordersSearch warrantsWiretap ordersPen register ordersEmergency requests
72%14%14%0%0%0%
Please note that percentages may not add up to a total of 100% due to rounding.
CountryTotalFraudSelf-harmHateful conductHarassmentSites specifiedRemoved due to request
Austria1100010%
Germany7502060%
Ireland1000110%
Malta1001010%
Spain3210070%
Total138131160%

Notes

  • Re: Disclosure Requests Received from EU Member States
  • The data provided is according to the requirements of the DSA, Article 15, “Transparency reporting obligations for providers of intermediary services.”
  • The information provided is for the total number of disclosure requests per country, broken down by type of reported content at issue.
  • Explanation of Median Time Reporting:
    • We report the median time in hours for two key stages: the initial response to the request and the “Substantive Response.” The latter is significantly longer because we follow a thorough process to ensure all legal requirements are met before disclosing user information, which often involves back-and-forth communication with the reporting Government. Consequently, these requests are only marked as complete once the entire process is finalized, which can substantially extend the median response time.

Recent Examples

Here are recent examples of requests for user information that we received from government sources. We did not provide information in response to these requests.

Malta

  • A law enforcement agency in Malta requested detailed information concerning an individual who left a comment on a WordPress.com site. No valid legal process was provided.

Switzerland

  • A Swiss law enforcement agency requested detailed information on a user and their two sites that was critical of various individuals, alleging the sites contained multiple instances of defamation. No specifics on the alleged individual being targeted were provided. No valid legal process was provided.