| Country | Number of requests | Percentage of requests where some or all information was produced | Number of accounts specified |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 0% | 4 |
| Germany | 3 | 0% | 5 |
| Greece | 1 | 0% | 1 |
| India | 6 | 0% | 7 |
| Italy | 1 | 0% | 1 |
| Mexico | 1 | 0% | 1 |
| Poland | 1 | 0% | 1 |
| Romania | 1 | 0% | 1 |
| Singapore | 1 | 0% | 1 |
| Spain | 2 | 0% | 2 |
| Switzerland | 1 | 0% | 1 |
| United States | 25 | 72% | 73 |
| Total | 45 | 40% | 98 |
**Includes information provided when a valid MLAT request has been made.
| Subpoenas | Court orders | Search warrants | Wiretap orders | Pen register orders | Emergency requests |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 72% | 8% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Recent Examples
Here are recent examples of requests for user information that we received from government sources. We did not provide information in response these requests.
India
- An investigator from India requested detailed user/site info in our possession concerning a site that was calling attention to an individual allegedly involved in criminal wrong doing pertaining to carpet sales. No valid legal process was provided.
- A police sub-inspector requested detailed information about the author of a site used to surface alleged corruption of a local company. No valid legal process was provided.
Transparency Report 