Country | Number of requests | Percentage of requests where some or all information was produced | Number of accounts specified |
---|---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | 0% | 2 |
Canada | 1 | 0% | 1 |
China | 1 | 0% | 1 |
Costa Rica | 1 | 0% | 1 |
France | 4 | 25% | 4 |
India | 13 | 0% | 12 |
Italy | 1 | 0% | 1 |
Mexico | 1 | 0% | 1 |
Peru | 1 | 0% | 1 |
Portugal | 3 | 0% | 1 |
Serbia | 1 | 0% | 1 |
Singapore | 1 | 0% | 1 |
Spain | 3 | 0% | 3 |
United States | 56 | 95% | 74 |
Total | 92 | 59% | 107 |
**Includes information provided when a valid MLAT request has been made.
Subpoenas | Court Orders | Search Warrants | Wiretap Orders | Pen Register Orders | Emergency Requests |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
80% | 12% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 2% |
Recent Examples
Here are a few recent examples of requests for user information that we received from government sources. We did not provide information in response to any of these requests.
India
- A police department in India requested detailed information for, and the deletion of a site that is critical of the management of a university, due to “uploading malicious/fake news photos/images of reputed college principal/chancellor and faculty”. No valid legal process was provided.
Brazil
- A police department in Brazil requested detailed information about the “person responsible for” a site that is critical of the privatization of state-owned companies. They provided no additional explanation, and no valid legal process.
France
- A police department in France requested detailed information about the person “who posted documents” on a site that is critical of the financial management of a local municipality. They provided no additional explanation, and no valid legal process.