Appeals by Reporters
| Total appeals received | Percentage of total appeals | |
|---|---|---|
| Approved | 1 | 1% |
| Rejected | 8 | 5% |
| Invalid | 144 | 94% |
Notes
- The data presented is in compliance with the requirements of Article 20 of the DSA.
- Appeals from reporters occur when individuals challenge decisions made on a notice they previously submitted. For example, if we inform a reporter that the content they reported was not actionable after review, they can appeal that decision.
- Approved appeals result in the reversal or alteration of a previous moderation decision.
- Rejected appeals indicate that the original action or decision was upheld.
- Appeals classified as invalid were reports that did not involve the appealing of a decision on a past report. An example of an invalid report would be where individuals submit new reports regarding user generated content.
Appeals by Users
| Total appeals received | Percentage of total appeals | |
|---|---|---|
| Approved | 3,488 | 42% |
| Rejected | 3,935 | 48% |
| Duplicate | 865 | 10% |
Notes
- The data presented is in compliance with the requirements of Article 20 of the DSA.
- Appeals from users relate to moderation decisions that affect users’ content and/or accounts. This includes content removals and/or restrictions, as well as account or blog suspensions and/or restrictions.
- Approved appeals resulted in the reversal of a moderation decision.
- Rejected appeals indicate that the action being appealed was upheld.
- The duplicate category tracks instances in which we received multiple appeals regarding the same issue during this reporting period.
Transparency Report 